If you are seeing this message, there was a problem loading the default style. Please click one of the Text Sizes below, which will fix this issue.
News
August 31, 2007

Panel reports on Virginia Tech
Full Story | Topics: ,

The Virginia Tech Panel Review investigating April’s campus shootings was critical of failures to link information and follow up for assailant Cho. It also clarified his history. Among its numerous concerns was whether mental health information should follow students applying to colleges. "It is common practice to require students entering a new school, college, or university to present records of immunization. Why not records of serious emotional or mental problems too?" The answer: "stigma." The Review recommended weighing this against “issues of public safety.”

If public safety is an overriding concern in the application procedure, why not also ask applicants a question more likely to expose risk: how many semi-automatic handguns, or other lethal weapons do they possess? About 16 gun deaths a year occur on colleges. The panel steered away from gun control, but did note Virginia Tech prohibited guns on campus. Other items the panel addressed include campus and police responses, Cho's educational background and treatments, confusion about federal privacy restrictions, the failure to engage his family, and tensions between privacy and protection. The report is available on-line.

   Post a Comment

MIWatch would love to hear your thoughts. Please join the discussion.


characters left

default medium big large
Consider This

Lunch is okay, but pencils are not
by Phyllis Vine

When the press gets it right. . .
by Phyllis Vine

Drug to stop smoking
by Phyllis Vine

When disclosure isn't enough
by Phyllis Vine

About the APA
by Phyllis Vine

Full Consider This Archives

Browse by Topic
MIWatch Archives

Recent Columns

Economic Security: Key to Recovery and Self-Determination
by Judith A. Cook

A proposal for transitional crisis beds
by Sol Wachtler

Psychiatric Advance Directives: A tool for patients and clinicians
by Marvin Swartz

Access to care: training consumers and case managers
by Jack Carney

Race, genetics, metabolism: drug therapy and clinical trials
by L. DiAnne Bradford

Home genetic tests: science or marketing?
by Laura Hercher

Let's stop saying "Mental Illness"
by David Oaks

Meeting family needs: Alameda County's new program
by Rebecca Woolis

Peer-to-Peer: Returning Vets' Mental Health Care
by Ralph Ibson

Q & A with Bill Emmet: Mandating health reform
by Phyllis Vine

Working with youthful offenders: Crossroads
by Linda Teodosio

Q & A with Anela Ka’iliawa: Wellness in Action
by Sarah A.H. Ho

Depression, advertising and pharma
by Julie Donahue

Complex PTSD
by Julian Ford

Disaster Mental Health
by Dr. Anthony T. Ng

A Personal Journey Wearing Three Hats: family, doctor and research director
by Lisa DIxon, MD, MPH

Breaking the Silence about Mental Illness in Schools
by Janet Susin

Q & A with Dr. Andrew P. Levin: The intersection of psychiatry and law
by Phyllis Vine

A Consumer's Voice--Hawai'i's Jail Diversion
by Sally Ho

When the Scars of Battle Haven't Healed: Reflections on Memorial Day
by Sol Wachtler

Full Columnist Archive

Reviews

"Comfortably Numb: How Psychiatry is Medicating a Nation," by Charles Barber
by Alison Bateman-House

"The Insanity Offense," E. Fuller Torrey
by Sue E. Estroff, Ph.D.

Men Get Depression
by Phyllis Vine

"Canvas:" A family portrait
by Phyllis Vine

"Shunned," by Graham Thornicroft
by Jean Arnold