If you are seeing this message, there was a problem loading the default style. Please click one of the Text Sizes below, which will fix this issue.
Consider This
January 11, 2008

FDA's "no comment"
Full Story | Topics: ,

by Phyllis Vine

wellbutrinbuderprion.jpg The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has long known that Budeprion XL 300, a generic antidepressant, acts differently than Wellbutrin 300 XL, the patented antidepressant. Yet it has taken no steps to alert consumers or physicians about reports of disturbing side effects from people who have been switched to the generic.

Information posted on the FDA website about generic drugs claim they are identical to their branded counterparts. But independent tests from ConsumerLab in October showed the two dissolve at different rates, with the generic releasing four times faster in the first two hours.

After several requests for an update about the status of their investigation, an FDA spokesperson told MIWatch on Thursday that the “FDA is continuing to evaluate the data regarding generic Wellbutrin. We have not yet released a statement." Nor has the agency posted an announcement on its website.

In an interview on the Larry Mantle radio show (Dec. 19), FDA Director of the Office of Medical Policy in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Bob Temple, said the FDA did not believe the faster action mattered. Temple said, ”having the blood levels come up a little bit sooner—two hours instead of four hours, say—should not interfere with the therapy. In fact, you might even think it would enhance it. “

Patients are finding otherwise. Many have reported adverse reactions -- anxiety, sleeplessness, agitation, crying, sadness, suicidal ideation -- within days of changing from Wellbutrin to Budeprion. When changing back, their symptoms abated. Similar complaints have been noted for the generic form of Zoloft. Both are made by Teva, an Israeli company with a global market and manufacturing plants in nine countries.

Problems widespread
Many patients did not know how widespread the problem was until they started to read about the experience of others on People's Pharmacy, a website where people post questions and comments about medication. It is run by Joe and Terry Graedon, authors and syndicated radio hosts.

Last week, appearing on the Graedon's radio show, FDA medical officer, Dr. Janet Woodcock, said the agency was still looking into the issue. She noted that their "post-marketing safety" is seriously compromised for lack of budget and staffing. Basically, she acknowledged that the watch-dog of the nation’s health relies on patients to volunteer complaints about adverse effects after the product is in the public's hands.

A section of the FDA's website, MedWatch, accepts complaints through a system Woodcock called “spontaneous reporting" -- a seven-page click-through eliciting descriptions of the problems which could range from a rash to the collapse of an artificial or mechanical valve, to side effects as serious as the contemplation of suicide.

With the numbers of drugs coming off-patent, and the push from government and insurance companies to spend less on medication, citizens rely on the FDA to guarantee generics are equivalent. But the quality controls, it seems, are weak.

Please take the time to comment about your experiences (good and bad) when changing from a brand name to a generic drug.

Related
Generic antidepressant not equal to patented product


   Post a Comment

MIWatch would love to hear your thoughts. Please join the discussion.


characters left

default medium big large
Consider This

Lunch is okay, but pencils are not
by Phyllis Vine

When the press gets it right. . .
by Phyllis Vine

Drug to stop smoking
by Phyllis Vine

When disclosure isn't enough
by Phyllis Vine

About the APA
by Phyllis Vine

Full Consider This Archives

Browse by Topic
MIWatch Archives

Recent Columns

Economic Security: Key to Recovery and Self-Determination
by Judith A. Cook

A proposal for transitional crisis beds
by Sol Wachtler

Psychiatric Advance Directives: A tool for patients and clinicians
by Marvin Swartz

Access to care: training consumers and case managers
by Jack Carney

Race, genetics, metabolism: drug therapy and clinical trials
by L. DiAnne Bradford

Home genetic tests: science or marketing?
by Laura Hercher

Let's stop saying "Mental Illness"
by David Oaks

Meeting family needs: Alameda County's new program
by Rebecca Woolis

Peer-to-Peer: Returning Vets' Mental Health Care
by Ralph Ibson

Q & A with Bill Emmet: Mandating health reform
by Phyllis Vine

Working with youthful offenders: Crossroads
by Linda Teodosio

Q & A with Anela Ka’iliawa: Wellness in Action
by Sarah A.H. Ho

Depression, advertising and pharma
by Julie Donahue

Complex PTSD
by Julian Ford

Disaster Mental Health
by Dr. Anthony T. Ng

A Personal Journey Wearing Three Hats: family, doctor and research director
by Lisa DIxon, MD, MPH

Breaking the Silence about Mental Illness in Schools
by Janet Susin

Q & A with Dr. Andrew P. Levin: The intersection of psychiatry and law
by Phyllis Vine

A Consumer's Voice--Hawai'i's Jail Diversion
by Sally Ho

When the Scars of Battle Haven't Healed: Reflections on Memorial Day
by Sol Wachtler

Full Columnist Archive

Reviews

"Comfortably Numb: How Psychiatry is Medicating a Nation," by Charles Barber
by Alison Bateman-House

"The Insanity Offense," E. Fuller Torrey
by Sue E. Estroff, Ph.D.

Men Get Depression
by Phyllis Vine

"Canvas:" A family portrait
by Phyllis Vine

"Shunned," by Graham Thornicroft
by Jean Arnold