If you are seeing this message, there was a problem loading the default style. Please click one of the Text Sizes below, which will fix this issue.
MIWatch webcasts
April 10, 2008

E. Fuller Torrey, panelist
Full Story | Topics: ,

E. Fuller Torrey, MD, is president of the Treatment Advocacy Center. Here he speaks on a panel about violence and mental illness at the Association of Health Care Journalists, Washington, DC, March 28, 2007.


  Comments (1)
Camille Santoro:

I did not attend this conference and do not know where Mr. Torrey's "statistics & research" was derived from, however, as a mental health advocate for 5 years now, I can tell you that there was a 1998 MacArthur Foundation study done which showed that the "mentally ill" are no more violent than the general public (the only exception being when alcohol & drugs are also abused and then incidents statistically increase, the SAME as for the "general public"). Mr. Torrey & TAC have falsely claimed in the past that "over 1,000 murders a year are committed by Americans with severe mental illnesses", but in reality, a study has shown that the "mentally ill" are 2 1/2 times more likely to be the VICTIMS of violence. How can Mr. Torrey & TAC make such false claims in the
face of actual statistical evidence? This would suggest, to me, some sort of 'hidden agenda' which one can only speculate about. Facts remain facts, however, and thus it has been proven that Mr. Torrey & TAC's claims are completely false.

Another of Mr. Torrey/TAC's arguments is that many patients reject services and are therefore "noncompliant". "Noncompliance" is simply a euphemism used to indicate that a person may be "uncooperative"; when choices are termed in this way, it only serves to expose how the free will, civil/human rights and dignity of an individual are being completely discounted and disregarded. This demonstrates how psychiatric services are not simply viewed as a possible personal medical choice or decision, for if an individual decides for themselves not to seek a particular psychiatric/medical treatment they are then labeled as 'noncompliant'. What treatment one chooses (or not) for his/her own body/mind/soul or any medical condition is certainly one's God given right to choose. It would appear that Mr. Torrey & TAC's reasoning, therefore, consists of the concept(s) of 'forced treatment', something completely UNacceptable and UNthinkable in every other area of medicine. Arguments used to back up this distorted reasoning serve only to induce fear into an already frightened public, yet, while the statistics and research have repeatedly proven that the "mentally ill" are actually LESS violent than the general population and forced treatment simply does not work as well as 'free treatment choices'. Mr. Torrey & TAC would benefit greatly by reviewing the actual research that has proven their claims to be false.

Finally, there was yet another study done assessing the NYC Involuntary Outpatient Commitment Pilot Program by Steadman, Gounis & Dennis, et al, conducted at Bellevue Hospital in the 1990's, which studied the question of "forced treatment vs. better access to services". The study compared two matched groups of people both with enhanced services but only one with court orders. It found that better acess to services reduced hospitalizations, but court orders added nothing in terms of individual's staying with treatment, symptoms, functioning, frequency of hospitalization, arrest, quality of life, etc. This suggests that better access and/or enhanced services, NOT forced treatment are the most beneficial to individuals.

Posted by Camille Santoro | May 1, 2008 3:00 AM

---

   Post a Comment

MIWatch would love to hear your thoughts. Please join the discussion.


characters left

default medium big large
Consider This

Lunch is okay, but pencils are not
by Phyllis Vine

When the press gets it right. . .
by Phyllis Vine

Drug to stop smoking
by Phyllis Vine

When disclosure isn't enough
by Phyllis Vine

About the APA
by Phyllis Vine

Full Consider This Archives

Browse by Topic
MIWatch Archives

Recent Columns

Economic Security: Key to Recovery and Self-Determination
by Judith A. Cook

A proposal for transitional crisis beds
by Sol Wachtler

Psychiatric Advance Directives: A tool for patients and clinicians
by Marvin Swartz

Access to care: training consumers and case managers
by Jack Carney

Race, genetics, metabolism: drug therapy and clinical trials
by L. DiAnne Bradford

Home genetic tests: science or marketing?
by Laura Hercher

Let's stop saying "Mental Illness"
by David Oaks

Meeting family needs: Alameda County's new program
by Rebecca Woolis

Peer-to-Peer: Returning Vets' Mental Health Care
by Ralph Ibson

Q & A with Bill Emmet: Mandating health reform
by Phyllis Vine

Working with youthful offenders: Crossroads
by Linda Teodosio

Q & A with Anela Ka’iliawa: Wellness in Action
by Sarah A.H. Ho

Depression, advertising and pharma
by Julie Donahue

Complex PTSD
by Julian Ford

Disaster Mental Health
by Dr. Anthony T. Ng

A Personal Journey Wearing Three Hats: family, doctor and research director
by Lisa DIxon, MD, MPH

Breaking the Silence about Mental Illness in Schools
by Janet Susin

Q & A with Dr. Andrew P. Levin: The intersection of psychiatry and law
by Phyllis Vine

A Consumer's Voice--Hawai'i's Jail Diversion
by Sally Ho

When the Scars of Battle Haven't Healed: Reflections on Memorial Day
by Sol Wachtler

Full Columnist Archive

Reviews

"Comfortably Numb: How Psychiatry is Medicating a Nation," by Charles Barber
by Alison Bateman-House

"The Insanity Offense," E. Fuller Torrey
by Sue E. Estroff, Ph.D.

Men Get Depression
by Phyllis Vine

"Canvas:" A family portrait
by Phyllis Vine

"Shunned," by Graham Thornicroft
by Jean Arnold